How does MRPC Rule 3.2 address delays in litigation?

The reasoning behind the correct choice lies in the explicit intention of MRPC Rule 3.2, which emphasizes the importance of expediting litigation. This rule dictates that lawyers should act without unnecessary delay in pursuing their clients' interests, aligning their actions with the professional duty to ensure that clients receive timely justice. This principle recognizes that delays can harm clients by prolonging their uncertainty and potentially jeopardizing their legal rights.

While thorough preparation is essential in legal practice, the rule does not endorse delays for the sake of preparation if they are unnecessary. The focus is on balancing the need for careful work with the imperative of moving cases forward efficiently. This is particularly relevant in the context of clients who may suffer prejudice from prolonged litigation processes. Thus, the goal is to advance cases efficiently while still allowing for responsible legal practices, but not at the cost of undue delay.

The other choices suggest either a justification for delay or a lack of urgency, which contrasts sharply with the core tenet of the rule that aims to prioritize clients' interests by avoiding unnecessary postponements in legal proceedings.