Under MRPC Rule 1.16, which situation does NOT require a lawyer to withdraw?

The correct choice is that feeling overwhelmed by the case does not require a lawyer to withdraw from representing a client under MRPC Rule 1.16. This rule outlines specific circumstances under which an attorney must withdraw from representation, such as violating professional conduct rules, being discharged by the client, or facing conflicts of interest.

Withdrawal due to feeling overwhelmed is not mandated by the rules because it does not inherently jeopardize the lawyer's ethical obligations or compromise the representation. Lawyers are expected to manage their caseloads effectively, and while feeling overwhelmed can affect their performance, it does not automatically necessitate withdrawal. Instead, a lawyer in this situation might seek assistance, manage their time better, or employ support staff to handle the workload more effectively.

In contrast, the other scenarios directly impact the lawyer’s ability to provide competent and ethical representation, thereby triggering a mandatory withdrawal. For instance, if continued representation would lead to a violation of ethical rules, or if a conflict of interest arises, withdrawal is necessary to maintain professional integrity and protect the interests of the client. Additionally, if a client discharges the lawyer, the lawyer must withdraw as the authority to represent is no longer valid.