Under MRPC Rule 3.3, what is a lawyer’s obligation concerning false evidence?

Under MRPC Rule 3.3, a lawyer's obligation concerning false evidence is clearly defined as the duty not to offer evidence that they know to be false. This rule is rooted in the fundamental principle of maintaining the integrity of the legal process and the responsibility attorneys have to the courts.

Specifically, if an attorney becomes aware that evidence they have presented is false, they are obliged to take remedial measures, which may involve disclosing that information to the court. This duty ensures that the legal system functions fairly and justly, as the introduction of false evidence undermines the truth-seeking mission of the courtroom.

The other options suggest different obligations, such as presenting evidence without bias or confidentiality issues, but they do not specifically address the critical requirement to refrain from presenting known false evidence, which is central to the ethical practice of law. The obligation not to present false evidence is paramount, as it directly affects the integrity of the attorney's role in the justice system.