Under MRPC Rule 3.4, what action is strictly prohibited?

The prohibition outlined in MRPC Rule 3.4 is focused on ensuring fairness and integrity in legal proceedings. Tampering with evidence or obstructing access to it fundamentally undermines the judicial process, which relies heavily on the truthfulness and availability of evidence. Lawyers are expected to promote honesty and respect for the legal system; engaging in any form of tampering or obstruction corrupts that process. This type of misconduct can lead to serious consequences, including disciplinary action against the attorney involved, and it can affect the outcomes of cases unjustly.

The other options, while potentially problematic in different respects, do not fall specifically under the prohibitions highlighted in Rule 3.4. For example, using personal connections to expedite cases may raise ethical questions regarding fairness or conflict of interest but does not directly relate to tampering with evidence. Offering legal advice to competitors may not inherently violate the rules but could raise concerns about confidentiality and loyalty to existing clients. Accepting cases in jurisdictions where an attorney is not authorized may violate procedural or licensing rules but does not pertain specifically to the integrity of evidence within the legal process. Thus, the focused prohibition on evidence tampering in Rule 3.4 is critical for upholding the standards of the profession.