When is a lawyer permitted to disclose a client’s confidential information under Rule 1.6?

A lawyer is permitted to disclose a client’s confidential information under Rule 1.6 when there is informed consent from the client or when it is necessary to prevent certain harms. This rule emphasizes the importance of client confidentiality while also recognizing the lawyer's duty to act in the best interest of the client and the wider community under certain conditions.

Informed consent is crucial because it places the decision in the hands of the client, ensuring they understand the implications of disclosing their information. Additionally, the rule allows disclosure to prevent imminent harm to individuals or the public, ultimately balancing the need for confidentiality with the potential necessity of action to prevent serious harm or injury.

Other options do not appropriately reflect the stipulations of Rule 1.6. For example, disclosing information when requested by the firm lacks the essential perspective of client consent. Similarly, disclosing information related specifically to a financial investigation or referring to a third party without the client's informed consent does not align with the confidentiality obligations under the rule.