When is it permissible for a lawyer to practice law in a jurisdiction where they are not admitted?

The option that states a lawyer can practice law in a jurisdiction where they are not admitted, as part of a legal team with a local lawyer, is rooted in professional conduct rules that address multijurisdictional practice. When a lawyer collaborates with a local attorney who is licensed in that jurisdiction, it enables the out-of-state lawyer to provide legal services without violating the local licensing requirements. This partnership allows the local attorney to offer guidance and ensure compliance with the local laws and ethical obligations, essentially providing a bridge between the out-of-state lawyer's expertise and the local rules.

In contrast, simply having permission from all parties does not typically suffice to validate the practice of law in a jurisdiction where the lawyer is not licensed. The law requires adherence to local regulations, irrespective of consent from the client or other parties involved.

Emergencies might allow for some temporary practice without licensing in certain jurisdictions, but this is not broadly applicable and is often limited to very specific situations.

Completing specific training does not grant a lawyer the authority to practice in a new jurisdiction. Licensing is governed by jurisdiction-specific rules which cannot be bypassed simply through training or education.

Thus, the correct answer reflects a recognized exception in legal practices where collaboration with a local lawyer provides