Which of the following actions is a prosecutor required to take when they learn of new evidence that casts doubt on a conviction?

The requirement for prosecutors to disclose new evidence that casts doubt on a conviction is grounded in the ethical obligations outlined in the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, specifically in Rule 3.8 regarding the special responsibilities of a prosecutor. This rule emphasizes that a prosecutor has an obligation to seek justice, not merely to convict, and thus must disclose any evidence that may exonerate a defendant or significantly undermine the prosecution's case.

When a prosecutor learns of new evidence that raises doubts about a previous conviction, disclosing that evidence promptly to the appropriate court or authority is critical. This disclosure ensures that the legal process can appropriately address the implications of the new information, potentially leading to a re-evaluation of the conviction or further investigation. The prosecutor’s role is to uphold the integrity of the judicial system, which includes taking action to remedy potential wrongful convictions.

In summary, the correct action for the prosecutor is to disclose the new evidence to the appropriate court or authority so that justice can be served, reflecting the ethical responsibilities inherent in their role. Ignoring the evidence or choosing to disclose it only to the media undermines the legal process and can contribute to miscarriages of justice. Similarly, waiting for a court directive hampers timely action that could correct an erroneous conviction.